Complete your thematic analysis on time, with ease and rigor

Writing a literature review chapter? Paste or upload the findings of 3–20 studies. Analysing your own interviews or survey responses? Same thing, one box per participant.
Pick a framework to auto-code your data into defendable themes, then refine, edit, or manual code inline to match your exact interpretation before exporting your report.

1 · What are you analysing?

Literature reviewSynthesise the published findings of 3–20 studies into cross-study themes.Primary researchAnalyse your own participant data — interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey answers.

2 · Choose your analysis framework

Reflexive Thematic AnalysisBraun & Clarke, 2006/2019The most widely taught approach: six phases from familiarisation to report.Thematic SynthesisThomas & Harden, 2008Built for synthesising findings across studies in systematic reviews.Framework AnalysisRitchie & Spencer, 1994Matrix-based approach popular in health and policy research.Grounded Theory (constant comparison)Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Corbin & StraussConcepts and categories built bottom-up toward an emerging theory.Qualitative Content AnalysisHsieh & Shannon, 2005; Elo & Kyngäs, 2008Descriptive, category-focused — closest to a structured summary.

3 · State your research question (optional)

The engine prioritises findings relevant to your question — leave blank for a fully open analysis.

Recorded verbatim in the exported audit trail and used to generate reflexivity prompts. It is never sent to the model, so it cannot steer the coding.

4 · Paste the findings/transcript or Upload PDF/DOCX (max 3MB). See what to paste →

Free tier: 15,000 characters (~2,500 words) per box. The paid tier: Up to 120,000 characters (~20,000 words) per box.

Don’t have your studies to hand?

File

0 / 15,000

File

0 / 15,000

File

0 / 15,000

3 studies · 3 free

2 of 2 free runs left

Free analysis (up to 2 runs) — no card, no signup.

Paste text into each study box to run the analysis.